Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 09:14

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Belmont Stakes 2025: Odds, horses, prediction, complete bettor’s guide - New York Post

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Costco opens a whole new kind of store - TheStreet

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Anker Recalls PowerCore 10000 Power Banks for Burning or Exploding. Learn How to Get a Free Replacement - CNET

Thank you.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Ford recalls 1M vehicles over backup camera glitch - MLive.com

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Why did losers ban TikTok?

Just in the last 5 years:

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

What’s next?

Beware: There’s a new Trump-RFK Jr. epidemic brewing - NJ.com

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Trump Biopic ‘The Apprentice’ Dominates Politically-Charged Canadian Screen Awards - The Hollywood Reporter

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Microbiome: First bacteria we meet can keep us out of hospital - BBC

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Taylor Swift Won Her Biggest Battle - The Ringer